Helonic
Case Study

How Drawing Review Caught an Unsupported Roof Condenser

  • A 5,000-lb roof condenser array had no structural support detail, the condensing unit clashed with the electrical gear, and the emergency-generator pad was undersized.
  • Helonic checked the hotel PDF sets for structure, electrical, and equipment pads before CD.
  • Those three findings are the kind that become $50,000 to $300,000 change orders once the equipment is on site.

Nashville, TN. 286 issues on 372 pages.

Issues Detected

286 on 372 pages

Field Cost

$50K to $300K each

Key Findings

Condenser, power, generator

A 5,000-lb Roof Condenser With No Support Detail

An owner's rep was reviewing construction documents for two hotels in Nashville. The roof carried a condensing-unit array the mechanical sheets sized at about 5,000 lb. The structural sheets had no support detail under it.

The same condensing unit sat on the electrical plan where the gear and the feeder could not both fit. The emergency generator pad on the civil sheet was smaller than the generator the electrical one-line called for.

Each of those is a field change once the unit is ordered. The owner's rep wanted them on the drawings before CD.

Helonic Found a 5,000-lb Load With No Steel Under It

They uploaded both PDF sets, 372 pages. Helonic compared the roof equipment weight with the structural details, the condensing unit with the electrical room, and the generator with its pad.

The list was 286 issues. The three that mattered first were the 5,000-lb roof condenser array with no structural support detail, the condensing-unit electrical conflict, and the undersized emergency-generator pad.

The design team added the roof support, moved the electrical gear, and resized the generator pad before CD.

See hotel construction drawing review, Tennessee plan review requirements, hotel construction coordination, generator and emergency power coordination, 2D clash detection, and the Charleston hotel review.

286 Issues on 372 Pages, $50,000 to $300,000 Kept Out of the Field

The owner's rep treated those three as field change orders in the $50,000 to $300,000 range: a new roof frame after the condenser is set, a rework of the electrical room, and a pad pour that has to be broken out.

Catching them on the PDF set kept that work in the drawings. The rest of the 286 issues were smaller coordination items on the same pages.

CD went out with the support detail, the electrical clearance, and a pad that matched the generator.

Roof equipment with no support detail is a mechanical and structural miss. Across 1,000+ drawing packages Helonic has reviewed, about 8 in 10 had at least one coordination conflict between disciplines. See how often construction projects go over budget.

NEC Article 700, NFPA 110, and the Undersized Generator Pad

Metro Nashville reviews commercial permits under the International Building Code with local amendments. Roof loads, including mechanical equipment, are designed to ASCE 7, which the code references.

A 5,000-lb condenser array is a concentrated load. The roof framing has to be designed for it, with dunnage or a support frame drawn where the unit sits. Without that detail, the steel erector has nothing to build and the unit has nothing to sit on.

Hotel emergency power falls under the National Electrical Code, Article 700 for emergency systems and Article 701 for legally required standby, and under NFPA 110 for the generator installation. The pad has to fit the generator the one-line calls for, with room for maintenance and the fuel system.

Electrical gear also needs its working clearance under NEC 110.26. Equipment drawn into the same footprint means one of them moves, and moving gear after the feeders are pulled is the expensive version.

“The 5,000-lb condenser had no steel under it, the condensing unit fought the electrical gear, and the generator pad was too small. Those are $50,000 to $300,000 change orders if they wait for the field.”

Senior Project Director, Owner's Representative FirmSenior project director at the owner's representative firm, speaking after both hotel sets were reviewed before CD.

Nashville Hotel Drawing Review: Questions and Answers

What did the Nashville hotel check cover?

Roof equipment support, the condensing-unit electrical conflict, and the emergency-generator pad, plus the rest of the coordination list on the PDF set.

How many issues were on the set?

286 issues on 372 pages, across two Nashville hotels.

What do those three findings cost in the field?

The owner's rep priced each one as a $50,000 to $300,000 change order if it is found after the equipment is set.

How is this different from the Charleston hotel story?

Nashville was a roof condenser, a condensing-unit electrical conflict, and an undersized generator pad. Charleston was ducts in the wrong bay and rooms the schedule counted that the plan did not draw.

Which codes govern a hotel emergency generator?

The National Electrical Code, Article 700 for emergency systems and Article 701 for legally required standby, and NFPA 110 for the generator installation. The pad has to match the generator on the one-line diagram.

How is heavy roof equipment supported?

The roof framing is designed for the equipment as a concentrated load under ASCE 7, with dunnage or a support frame detailed under the unit. This set had no support detail under a 5,000-lb array.

When did the owner's rep run the review?

Before construction documents were issued, so the design team could add the roof support, move the electrical gear, and resize the pad in the drawings.

MS

Milind Sagaram

Co-founder & CEO, Helonic

Milind is the co-founder and CEO of Helonic, where he leads product and go-to-market for AI-powered construction drawing analysis. He works closely with general contractors, project managers, estimators, and owners to understand how drawing quality drives project outcomes - and where AI can reduce RFIs, change orders, and rework. Milind has interviewed hundreds of construction professionals across project delivery roles, from preconstruction estimators at ENR top-400 contractors to facilities directors at institutional owners, and uses those conversations to shape both product direction and the way Helonic talks about the work.

Areas of focus
  • Construction project delivery and preconstruction
  • RFI and change order economics
  • Owner and GC workflows for drawing QA/QC
  • Estimating risk and bid-stage scope assessment

How this page was researched: Reviewed against Helonic's 2026 drawing-analysis categories, RFI workflow, and product capabilities.

Last reviewed by Milind Sagaram · September 20, 2026

See what Helonic catches on your drawings

Upload your PDF set and we'll walk you through every coordination conflict, code gap, and dimension mismatch our AI flags.