Progress Set Review That Catches Issues While They're Still Cheap to Fix
Issues caught at 30% cost minutes. The same issues caught at 100% cost weeks. Helonic shifts the curve.
Every design firm intends to do thorough internal reviews at DD and 60/95% CD milestones. The reality is those reviews happen late, get rushed, or get skipped under deadline pressure. Helonic gives the team a tireless internal reviewer who reads the set at every milestone, surfaces the issues consistently, and gets sharper as the documentation evolves.
The economics of catching issues early
An issue caught at 30% CD is a five-minute conversation. The same issue caught at 100% CD is a sheet revision, a coordination meeting, and possibly a permit re-submittal. The architects we work with universally know this but struggle to staff thorough milestone reviews when production deadlines are competing for the same hours.
Milestone review workflow
Configure milestone in Helonic
Select the milestone (30/50/80/95/100%) and Helonic loads the appropriate depth of checks.
Upload the set
Drag in the current drawings and specs. Helonic associates them with the project record.
Review milestone findings
Findings sorted by severity and by whether they persist from a previous milestone. Resolved issues from prior milestones are tracked.
Export milestone report
Generate a structured milestone QA report for the project record and team distribution.
How Helonic helps
Catches issues earlier in the design process
Helonic runs at 30%, 50%, 80%, or any milestone. Each pass surfaces issues at the right depth for that level of development.
Tracks issues across milestones
Issues persist in Helonic across milestones. An issue surfaced at 30% that wasn't resolved by 60% gets escalated automatically.
Calibrated to the milestone
Helonic doesn't expect 30% drawings to look like CDs. The check rules are calibrated to what's reasonable at each level of development.
Documents the review for the project record
Every Helonic pass produces a structured report that becomes part of the project QA record - useful for both internal QA and E&O documentation.
Key features for this workflow
Milestone-appropriate rule sets (30/50/80/100% CD)
Issue persistence across milestones with auto-escalation
Discipline coordination depth proportional to LOD
Schedule completeness tracking through the design process
Specification development cross-check at each milestone
Project record export at each pass
Example issues Helonic catches
Real-world issues detected by AI analysis, specific to architects running progress set review:
At 30% CD: site plan shows building footprint that doesn't match the structural grid layout on S-100 - coordination gap to resolve before DD
At 50% CD: door schedule includes 247 doors but the partition plan shows 219 - count drift needs reconciling
At 80% CD: wall types W-1 through W-5 defined on the wall type sheet but W-6 appears on plans without definition
At 80% CD: equipment schedule on M-401 lists three rooftop units but only two locations are shown on the roof plan
At 95% CD: code summary still cites 2018 IBC but adopted-edition tracker shows project is under 2021 IBC for permit
At 100% CD: detail callouts on A-401 reference details 5/A-602 and 7/A-602, but A-602 only goes through detail 6
What construction professionals told us
“The architects we talked with all said the same thing about milestone reviews: 'we know we should, we mean to, we don't.' The barrier wasn't will - it was time. The thing they wanted was a reviewer who could do the first 80% of the work in the background.”
Conversations with principals and project architects at firms ranging from boutique residential to large institutional practices.
FAQs
What if our milestones don't follow 30/50/80?
Helonic can be configured for any milestone schedule. The check depth scales smoothly across LODs.
Does it overload the team with findings at early milestones?
No - early milestone checks are calibrated to surface only the issues meaningful at that stage. The model expects 30% drawings to be incomplete and won't flag missing details that aren't yet supposed to be drawn.
Can we share milestone reports with the owner or consultants?
Yes. Each milestone export is a structured PDF that's appropriate for sharing externally, with internal-only items kept private.
Manas Gandhi
Co-founder & CTO, HelonicManas is the co-founder and CTO of Helonic, where he leads engineering and AI research for construction drawing analysis. He works directly with structural, MEP, civil, and fire protection engineers to translate the way they review drawings into AI systems that flag the issues that actually matter in the field. Before Helonic, he built machine learning pipelines for technical document understanding and has spent the last several years interviewing licensed design engineers and discipline leads to ground product decisions in real practice rather than industry assumptions.
- AI for technical document understanding
- Cross-discipline coordination workflows
- Code compliance automation (IBC, NEC, NFPA, IPC, IMC, ASCE)
- Structural and MEP drawing review systems
How this page was researched: Conversations with principals and project architects at firms ranging from boutique residential to large institutional practices.
Last reviewed by Manas Gandhi · May 2026
Other use cases for architects
Progress Set Review for other roles
Try Helonic on progress set review for your next project
See how Helonic catches the issues that matter most to architects. Upload your drawings for a free analysis.